<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comparing Dispensational Theology and Covenant Theology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fide-o.com/2009/05/comparing-dispensational-theology-and-covenant-theology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fide-o.com/2009/05/comparing-dispensational-theology-and-covenant-theology/</link>
	<description>Jason Robertson&#039;s Articles, Sermons, and Discussions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:39:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Robertson</title>
		<link>http://fide-o.com/2009/05/comparing-dispensational-theology-and-covenant-theology/comment-page-1/#comment-1010</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fide-o.com/?p=582#comment-1010</guid>
		<description>Dave, you claim that MacArthur &quot;would disagree with most all of the points listed above his name.&quot;  Please prove your claim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, you claim that MacArthur &#8220;would disagree with most all of the points listed above his name.&#8221;  Please prove your claim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://fide-o.com/2009/05/comparing-dispensational-theology-and-covenant-theology/comment-page-1/#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fide-o.com/?p=582#comment-1009</guid>
		<description>The pretext of this post is inflammitory and misrepresents the views of most dispensationalists.  MacArthur for instance would disagree with most all of the points listed above his name.  He has stated that clearly, and that is available in even a cursery search of his views on this matter on the internet.  Just like other folks who are married to Calvin, this poster finds it favorable to his thesis to lump all dispensationalists with the extreme views of Scofield and other DTS leaders who shall go unnamed. Until the covenantalists are willing to look at the holes in their own system, they will continue to ramble on with their hands over their ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The pretext of this post is inflammitory and misrepresents the views of most dispensationalists.  MacArthur for instance would disagree with most all of the points listed above his name.  He has stated that clearly, and that is available in even a cursery search of his views on this matter on the internet.  Just like other folks who are married to Calvin, this poster finds it favorable to his thesis to lump all dispensationalists with the extreme views of Scofield and other DTS leaders who shall go unnamed. Until the covenantalists are willing to look at the holes in their own system, they will continue to ramble on with their hands over their ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eloquorius</title>
		<link>http://fide-o.com/2009/05/comparing-dispensational-theology-and-covenant-theology/comment-page-1/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>Eloquorius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 00:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fide-o.com/?p=582#comment-935</guid>
		<description>Let me add my own &quot;Thanks!&quot; for putting together this helpful chart of comparison.  As a former dispy, I know they won&#039;t like it, but then again it was resources like this that drew me away from dispy chaos and into a right understanding of covenant theology.  So a heart &quot;Well done!&quot; to ya!

@Pete (Comment #901): No, MacArthur is in the right column.  He&#039;s a firm dispensationalist and infact virulently anti-ever-other-position. How else could he have the temerity to preach his sermon, &quot;Why Every Self-Respecting Calvinist Is a Pre-millennialist&quot; at the Shepard Conference.  He even said that &quot;if Calvin were here he would join our movement&quot; because of Israel has lasted this long and is now being re-established as a nation.  For an excellent response to John MacArthur&#039;s inane dispy rant at the Shepard Converence, see: &lt;a href=&quot;http://kimriddlebarger.squarespace.com/a-reply-to-john-macarthur/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://kimriddlebarger.squarespace.com/a-reply-to-john-macarthur/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me add my own &#8220;Thanks!&#8221; for putting together this helpful chart of comparison.  As a former dispy, I know they won&#8217;t like it, but then again it was resources like this that drew me away from dispy chaos and into a right understanding of covenant theology.  So a heart &#8220;Well done!&#8221; to ya!</p>
<p>@Pete (Comment #901): No, MacArthur is in the right column.  He&#8217;s a firm dispensationalist and infact virulently anti-ever-other-position. How else could he have the temerity to preach his sermon, &#8220;Why Every Self-Respecting Calvinist Is a Pre-millennialist&#8221; at the Shepard Conference.  He even said that &#8220;if Calvin were here he would join our movement&#8221; because of Israel has lasted this long and is now being re-established as a nation.  For an excellent response to John MacArthur&#8217;s inane dispy rant at the Shepard Converence, see: <a href="http://kimriddlebarger.squarespace.com/a-reply-to-john-macarthur/" rel="nofollow">http://kimriddlebarger.squarespace.com/a-reply-to-john-macarthur/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas K. Adu-Boahen</title>
		<link>http://fide-o.com/2009/05/comparing-dispensational-theology-and-covenant-theology/comment-page-1/#comment-924</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas K. Adu-Boahen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 01:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fide-o.com/?p=582#comment-924</guid>
		<description>And it ain&#039;t Roman Catholicism...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And it ain&#8217;t Roman Catholicism&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
